GD:Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?
In my point of view introducing the option NOTA is correct. We choose to vote for the right leader that he/she should be favor for the people and that would lead to the right society. If a person thought that none of the leaders are thankful to people then he can choose NOTA so that the government can take the proper measurements in giving the chance to the right person to enter into the constitution. So in my point of view NOTA is one of the important option in election so that every citizen can hold their opinion and while introducing this it should be aware to all the people so that nothing wrong can be attempted. ========================================================================
Hello friends! From my point of view NOTA is a good technique. To improve the thinking of the people who think election is simply a time wasting system. I think two button are provided for each candidate that is positive or negative. Those who think the person will the candidate is good for society will give the positive vote and who doesn't will give negative. Thank you.
========================================================================
Hello guys, I am in the favor of NOTA because people from different origin are get settled in different states of our country and they posses the right to vote, if they were for more than 5 years. So people expresses his interest towards elective candidate by not to go for vote method. But it result in win of those who are not good. If we appoint NOTA then peoples who initially do not vote they will Vote. And second step is that there should provide one more NOTA button for each candidate. So if candidate obtain 40% NOTA of the number of votes he obtained then One more BIll should have to pass Which state that he or his party have to give Fine for selecting wrong candidate and that amount should be in proportion of Amount required to take re-election. Hence, this also gives benefits to people without wasting their money for this re- election.
In my point of view introducing the option NOTA is correct. We choose to vote for the right leader that he/she should be favor for the people and that would lead to the right society. If a person thought that none of the leaders are thankful to people then he can choose NOTA so that the government can take the proper measurements in giving the chance to the right person to enter into the constitution. So in my point of view NOTA is one of the important option in election so that every citizen can hold their opinion and while introducing this it should be aware to all the people so that nothing wrong can be attempted. ========================================================================
Hello friends! From my point of view NOTA is a good technique. To improve the thinking of the people who think election is simply a time wasting system. I think two button are provided for each candidate that is positive or negative. Those who think the person will the candidate is good for society will give the positive vote and who doesn't will give negative. Thank you.
========================================================================
Hello guys, I am in the favor of NOTA because people from different origin are get settled in different states of our country and they posses the right to vote, if they were for more than 5 years. So people expresses his interest towards elective candidate by not to go for vote method. But it result in win of those who are not good. If we appoint NOTA then peoples who initially do not vote they will Vote. And second step is that there should provide one more NOTA button for each candidate. So if candidate obtain 40% NOTA of the number of votes he obtained then One more BIll should have to pass Which state that he or his party have to give Fine for selecting wrong candidate and that amount should be in proportion of Amount required to take re-election. Hence, this also gives benefits to people without wasting their money for this re- election.
No comments:
Post a Comment